Morphological Change

Linguistics > Historical Linguistics > Morphological Change

Historical Linguistics is a branch of linguistics that studies the evolution and development of languages over time. Within this broad discipline, one area of focus is morphological change. Morphological change pertains to alterations in the structure and form of words within a language’s lexicon.

Morphology, a core component of linguistic analysis, deals with the study of morphemes—the smallest units of meaning in a language. Morphemes can be roots, prefixes, suffixes, or infixes. Morphological change, therefore, involves how these morphemes evolve, merge, split, and transform through linguistic processes over centuries or even millennia.

Several key processes drive morphological change:
1. Affixation and Loss: Languages frequently gain or lose affixes (prefixes, suffixes, infixes, and circumfixes). For example, the Old English suffix “-lic” evolved into the Modern English “-ly” to form adverbs.

  1. Analogy: This process occurs when irregular forms become regularized according to more common patterns. An example of this in English is the shift from “oxen” to “oxes” (though “oxen” remains the correct plural form today, “oxes” is often heard colloquially).

  2. Compounding: The creation of new words by combining two or more existing morphemes. For instance, the Modern English word “blackbird” consists of two morphemes: “black” and “bird”.

  3. Inflectional Changes: These refer to changes in the way words modify to express different grammatical categories such as tense, case, voice, aspect, person, number, gender, and mood. English has seen a reduction in its inflectional system from Old English to Modern English.

  4. Grammaticalization: This is a process by which words become part of the grammar, often transitioning from having lexical meaning to a grammatical function. An example is the development of the future tense marker in English, “will”, which originally meant “to want” (as in “I will” = “I want”).

Morphological changes can often be understood through the comparison of diachronic linguistic data—observing and analyzing language at different historical stages. These processes are vital in reconstructing proto-languages and understanding language families. For instance, by analyzing the morphological changes in various Indo-European languages, linguists can infer features of Proto-Indo-European.

Overall, morphological change illustrates the dynamic and evolving nature of language. It’s an essential aspect of historical linguistics, offering insights into how languages adapt to social, cognitive, and communicative needs over time. Understanding these changes not only deciphers the past structures and uses of languages but also aids in the prediction and comprehension of current linguistic trends.